chore: updates near-* dependencies to 0.24.0

[akorchyn]

near-workspaces should be updated later. It's not a blocker as it's used in tests and it has cyclic dependency :)

cc @race-of-sloths

[race-of-sloths]

@akorchyn Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request is now a part of the Race of Sloths!
We are launching a survey "Who is faster? You vs SpaceX"

Current status: executed

Reviewer	Score
@frol	5
@ruseinov	5

Your contribution is much appreciated with a final score of 5!
You have received 50 Sloth points for this contribution

What is the Race of Sloths

Race of Sloths is a friendly competition where you can participate in challenges and compete with other open-source contributors within your normal workflow

For contributors:

• Tag @race-of-sloths inside your pull requests
• Wait for the maintainer to review and score your pull request
• Check out your position in the Leaderboard
• Keep weekly and monthly streaks to reach higher positions
• Boast your contributions with a dynamic picture of your Profile

For maintainers:

• Score pull requests that participate in the Race of Sloths
• Engage contributors with fair scoring and fast responses so they keep their streaks
• Promote the Race to the point where the Race starts promoting you
• Grow the community of your contributors

Feel free to check our website for additional details!

Bot commands

• For contributors
  • Include a PR: @race-of-sloths include to enter the Race with your PR
• For maintainers:
  • Invite contributor @race-of-sloths invite to invite the contributor to participate in a race or include it, if it's already a runner.
  • Assign points: @race-of-sloths score [1/2/3/5/8/13] to award points based on your assessment.
  • Reject this PR: @race-of-sloths exclude to send this PR back to the drawing board.
  • Exclude repo: @race-of-sloths pause to stop bot activity in this repo until @race-of-sloths unpause command is called

[dj8yfo]

@ruseinov insert_and_remove fails in storage_performance_tests.rs (a few reruns). What's a possible fix?

[ruseinov]

@ruseinov insert_and_remove fails in storage_performance_tests.rs (a few reruns). What's a possible fix?

Run locally and adjust the number if iterations for each collection.
In this case it consumes less gas than expected, it's not a bad thing. There was enough slack given to avoid those errors, but if there is a significant deviation - this will fail with an error.

[akorchyn]

I have updated amount of iterations, let's see, but anyways, we should a bit on hold this PR, as windows is part of testing, and it's broken now in 0.24 release :(

See details: https://near.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/295558-core/topic/windows.20compilation.20issue.20on.202.2E0.2E0/near/459477738

[ruseinov]

I have updated amount of iterations, let's see, but anyways, we should a bit on hold this PR, as windows is part of testing, and it's broken now in 0.24 release :(

See details: https://near.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/295558-core/topic/windows.20compilation.20issue.20on.202.2E0.2E0/near/459477738

There is another collection that is failing now. I would suggest running those tests locally first an making sure they are well above the lower range on your machine. Then it's likely to pass in the CI.
The problem is that the gas amounts are slightly different depending on the build environment.

Yeah, it seems broken indeed.

[akorchyn]

Sure, I have adjusted all 5 tests to be in somewhere [98-103] range to give extra flex. A lot of them was in 90ish

[frol]

Did we get a free 5-10% improvement in runtime performance by just upgrading the dependencies? Nice

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (master@66918f3). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1237   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   79.61%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      102           
  Lines             ?    14606           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    11628           
  Misses            ?     2978           
  Partials          ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ruseinov]

Did we get a free 5-10% improvement in runtime performance by just upgrading the dependencies? Nice

I have a suspicion that this has to do specifically with near-workspaces update as that's what is currently used for our integration testing. Either way it's nice!

[akorchyn]

+1, but also I think that you might have improved performance in other PRs, but it was still in range and this PR just reached the threshold

[akorchyn]

E.g. PR like this one: #1220 definitely improved some gas performance

[race-of-sloths]

🥁 Score it!

@frol @ruseinov, please score the PR with @race-of-sloths score [1/2/3/5/8/13]. The contributor deserves it.
If no scoring is provided within 24 hours, this PR will be scored as 2 🦥

[frol]

@race-of-sloths score 5

[ruseinov]

@race-of-sloths score 5