-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add a protocol version running near-vm #8912
Merged
near-bulldozer
merged 12 commits into
near:master
from
Ekleog-NEAR:near-vm-protocol-change
Apr 18, 2023
Merged
add a protocol version running near-vm #8912
near-bulldozer
merged 12 commits into
near:master
from
Ekleog-NEAR:near-vm-protocol-change
Apr 18, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nagisa
reviewed
Apr 13, 2023
nagisa
reviewed
Apr 13, 2023
jakmeier
requested changes
Apr 17, 2023
@jakmeier This is ready for review round 2 :) |
jakmeier
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, let's ship it 🎉 🥳
nikurt
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
This closes up the near-vm work. I believe #8886 (comment) is the only remaining point to be checked in former PRs, in addition to all the code added in this PR. Note that there are still things in #8323 that are not in this PR, because either I noticed they actually should not be merged (eg. the wasmparser bump would be a protocol upgrade, so will wait until we get limited replayability), or because they are actually orthogonal to this landing.
nikurt
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2023
This closes up the near-vm work. I believe #8886 (comment) is the only remaining point to be checked in former PRs, in addition to all the code added in this PR. Note that there are still things in #8323 that are not in this PR, because either I noticed they actually should not be merged (eg. the wasmparser bump would be a protocol upgrade, so will wait until we get limited replayability), or because they are actually orthogonal to this landing.
nikurt
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
This closes up the near-vm work. I believe #8886 (comment) is the only remaining point to be checked in former PRs, in addition to all the code added in this PR. Note that there are still things in #8323 that are not in this PR, because either I noticed they actually should not be merged (eg. the wasmparser bump would be a protocol upgrade, so will wait until we get limited replayability), or because they are actually orthogonal to this landing.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This closes up the near-vm work. I believe #8886 (comment) is the only remaining point to be checked in former PRs, in addition to all the code added in this PR.
Note that there are still things in #8323 that are not in this PR, because either I noticed they actually should not be merged (eg. the wasmparser bump would be a protocol upgrade, so will wait until we get limited replayability), or because they are actually orthogonal to this landing.