perf: optimize benchmarks/fibonacci/handwritten_wat.wat
#169
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Closing as this PR was filed just for reference. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Taking inspiration from WASM generated by the Rust compiler (e.g. here), this removes a
blockand decreases$counterto avoid doing a comparison like$counter == 10000. More details in the comment added tohandwritten_wat.wat.Even though the WAT is simpler, the number of cycles required to executed the generated zkASM does not change. Understanding why there is no reduction of cycles potentially could hint at some optimizations for the generated zkASM.
CC @Akashin as this is part of the investigations carried out for #151.