feat: improve new action cache logging

[ChristopherHX]

Resolves #2471

Example the GoGitActionCache are new logging entries in default log level ( --use-new-action-cache )

[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] GoGitActionCache fetch https://github.com/actions/github-script with ref v7 at /home/christopher/.cache/act/actions-github-script.git resolved to 60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] GoGitActionCache get content actions/github-script with sha 60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea subpath action.yml at /home/christopher/.cache/act/actions-github-script.git
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] ⭐ Run Main actions/github-script@v7
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] GoGitActionCache get content actions/github-script with sha 60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea subpath  at /home/christopher/.cache/act/actions-github-script.git
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test]   | { b: 'true', b2: 'true' }
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test]   ✅  Success - Main actions/github-script@v7
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test]   ⚙  ::set-output:: result=

LocalRepositoryCache logging ( --local-repository actions/github-script@v7=/tmp )

[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] ⭐ Run Main actions/checkout@v4
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test]   ✅  Success - Main actions/checkout@v4
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] ⭐ Run Main ./uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/composite_action
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] LocalRepositoryCache matched https://github.com/actions/github-script with ref v7 to /tmp/
[uses-composite-check-for-input-in-if-uses/test] LocalRepositoryCache read cachedir actions/github-script with ref v7 and subpath action.yml from /tmp/

Behind feature flags --use-new-action-cache / --local-repository / (--action-offline-mode logging adjusted if one previous feature flag is enabled)

[github-actions]

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Elapsed time
✅ EDITORCONFIG	editorconfig-checker	4		0	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	gitleaks	yes		no	2.33s
✅ REPOSITORY	git_diff	yes		no	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	grype	yes		no	8.72s
✅ REPOSITORY	secretlint	yes		no	1.02s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy-sbom	yes		no	0.48s
✅ REPOSITORY	trufflehog	yes		no	4.42s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

MegaLinter is graciously provided by

[ChristopherHX]

I have plans to finally deprecate the old method for fetching actions to improve reliability and reduce download/cache size: #2472.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.75%. Comparing base (5a80a04) to head (87547ff).
Report is 119 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/runner/action_cache.go	46.66%	8 Missing ⚠️
pkg/runner/action_cache_offline_mode.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/runner/local_repository_cache.go	75.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2474       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   61.56%   76.75%   +15.18%     
===========================================
  Files          53       62        +9     
  Lines        9002     8211      -791     
===========================================
+ Hits         5542     6302      +760     
+ Misses       3020     1346     -1674     
- Partials      440      563      +123     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mergify]

@ChristopherHX this pull request has failed checks 🛠

[ChristopherHX]

Do I really need the 4.85% missing coverage for logging and enhanced errors?