-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: wait walreceiver on sks to be gone on 'immediate' ep restart. #9099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5065 tests run: 4907 passed, 0 failed, 158 skipped (full report)Flaky tests (14)Postgres 17
Postgres 16
Postgres 15
Code coverage* (full report)
* collected from Rust tests only The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
8c59bcb at 2024-09-27T07:30:14.662Z :recycle: |
koivunej
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just typo and a question.
When endpoint is stopped in immediate mode and started again there is a change of old connection delivering some WAL to safekeepers after second start checked need for sync-safekeepers and thus grabbed basebackup LSN. It makes basebackup unusable, so compute panics. Avoid flakiness by waiting for walreceivers on safekeepers to be gone in such cases. A better way would be to bump term on safekeepers if sync-safekeepers is skipped, but it needs more infrastructure. ref #9079
arssher
force-pushed
the
immediate-restart-wait-sk-conn
branch
from
September 26, 2024 15:44
2362c42
to
8c59bcb
Compare
hlinnaka
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2024
Restarted the failed e2e test; that's surely not related to this PR. |
Is this ready to be merged? |
yes, merged |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When endpoint is stopped in immediate mode and started again there is a chance of old connection delivering some WAL to safekeepers after second start checked need for sync-safekeepers and thus grabbed basebackup LSN. It makes basebackup unusable, so compute panics. Avoid flakiness by waiting for walreceivers on safekeepers to be gone in such cases. A better way would be to bump term on safekeepers if sync-safekeepers is skipped, but it needs more infrastructure.
ref #9079