Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

storcon_cli tenant-describe: include tenant-wide information in output #9899

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

problame
Copy link
Contributor

@problame problame commented Nov 26, 2024

Before this PR, the storcon_cli didn't have a way to show the tenant-wide information of the TenantDescribeResponse.

Sadly, the Serialize impl for the tenant config doesn't skip on None, so, the output becomes a bit bloated.
Maybe we can use skip_serializing_if(Option::is_none) in the future.
=> #9983

Sadly, the tenant config doesn't skip on None, so, the output becomes
a bit bloated.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2024

7018 tests run: 6710 passed, 0 failed, 308 skipped (full report)


Flaky tests (3)

Postgres 16

Postgres 14

Code coverage* (full report)

  • functions: 30.4% (8270 of 27233 functions)
  • lines: 47.7% (65204 of 136595 lines)

* collected from Rust tests only


The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
ef70a70 at 2024-12-02T16:03:22.143Z :recycle:

@problame problame requested a review from jcsp December 2, 2024 11:07
@problame problame added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 15d01b2 Dec 3, 2024
80 checks passed
@problame problame deleted the problame/storcon-cli-tenant-describe branch December 3, 2024 10:57
awarus pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
#9899)

Before this PR, the storcon_cli didn't have a way to show the
tenant-wide information of the TenantDescribeResponse.

Sadly, the `Serialize` impl for the tenant config doesn't skip on
`None`, so, the output becomes a bit bloated.
Maybe we can use `skip_serializing_if(Option::is_none)` in the future.
=> #9983
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants