Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1287: rtt blog updates to reflect last changes in ebpf agent #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

@msherif1234 msherif1234 commented Jan 12, 2024

additionl updates to RTT blog follow up for #54

@msherif1234 msherif1234 force-pushed the rtt-update branch 3 times, most recently from 1c04b32 to 1e1f1bd Compare January 15, 2024 11:53
Copy link
Contributor

@skrthomas skrthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments and suggestions :) looking really good, team!

blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
an initial RTT of `10usec` is assigned.
This initial value for RTT may be considered quite low.

Upon triggering the eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) socket, the flow's RTT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Upon triggering the eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) socket, the flow's RTT
Upon triggering the eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) socket, the RTT flow

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead of making flow possessive, I wonder if we can flip it to "RTT flow value"?

@msherif1234 msherif1234 changed the title Rtt update NETOBSERV-1287: rtt blog updates to reflect last changes in ebpf agent Jan 16, 2024
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blogs/rtt/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mahmoud <mmahmoud@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, feel free to merge !
Thanks @msherif1234

@msherif1234 msherif1234 merged commit 29dec26 into netobserv:main Jan 23, 2024
@msherif1234 msherif1234 deleted the rtt-update branch January 23, 2024 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants