s390x arch work around till bpf2go pr#1308 is available

[msherif1234]

Description

bpf2go tool doesn't generate the right extension for auto generate go file
till cilium/ebpf#1308 is in place I will just use this work around

UT

MULTIARCH_TARGETS="amd64 arm64 ppc64le s390x" IMAGE_ORG=netobserv VERSION=main make images

docker images
REPOSITORY                               TAG            IMAGE ID       CREATED          SIZE
quay.io/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent   main-s390x     7e20553e707f   9 minutes ago    173MB
quay.io/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent   main-ppc64le   13331fda550b   10 minutes ago   194MB
quay.io/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent   main-arm64     a4a676a8c70e   11 minutes ago   172MB
quay.io/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent   main-amd64     8b881a32868d   12 minutes ago   171MB

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2864713) 33.77% compared to head (3a90bcd) 33.86%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   33.77%   33.86%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        3479     3479              
==========================================
+ Hits         1175     1178       +3     
+ Misses       2235     2233       -2     
+ Partials       69       68       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	33.86% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jotak]

/lgtm

[msherif1234]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [msherif1234]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment