Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check i18n on PR check #308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Mar 21, 2023

No description provided.

@jotak jotak added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels Mar 21, 2023
@jotak jotak requested a review from jpinsonneau March 21, 2023 09:18
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #308 (f2d456f) into main (e0adb59) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #308   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.79%   58.79%           
=======================================
  Files         147      147           
  Lines        6466     6466           
  Branches      772      772           
=======================================
  Hits         3802     3802           
  Misses       2449     2449           
  Partials      215      215           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 59.48% <ø> (ø)
unittests 56.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ jobs:
- name: checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: build and test
run: make frontend && git diff --exit-code
run: make frontend i18n && git diff --exit-code
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As build-frontend already run fmt-frontend in the Makefile, I would prefer forcing i18n in this command so developers don't need to think about it before pushing code.

WDYT ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, both work for me

Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jotak

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 21, 2023
@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Mar 21, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b00b682 into netobserv:main Mar 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants