NETOBSERV-1200: Show "< 1ms" for 0 latency instead of n/a

[jotak]

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1200 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #360 (7dbb6f0) into main (56386e8) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 57.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #360      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.97%   57.96%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         154      159       +5     
  Lines        6994     7168     +174     
  Branches      863      868       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         4055     4155     +100     
- Misses       2697     2767      +70     
- Partials      242      246       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	59.80% <57.66%> (+0.73%)	⬆️
unittests	52.71% <ø> (-2.10%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
web/src/components/__tests-data__/flows.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...components/netflow-topology/2d/components/edge.tsx	35.71% <ø> (ø)
...c/components/netflow-topology/netflow-topology.tsx	67.74% <0.00%> (-2.26%)	⬇️
...omponents/netflow-topology/2d/topology-content.tsx	28.42% <12.50%> (-0.37%)	⬇️
web/src/components/netflow-tab.tsx	50.00% <22.22%> (ø)
web/src/model/topology.ts	32.79% <25.00%> (-0.36%)	⬇️
...nts/netflow-topology/2d/styles/styleDecorators.tsx	26.82% <26.82%> (ø)
...omponents/netflow-topology/2d/styles/styleNode.tsx	31.11% <28.57%> (+1.94%)	⬆️
...ents/netflow-topology/2d/styles/styleDecorator.tsx	38.46% <38.46%> (ø)
web/src/model/filters.ts	70.37% <42.85%> (+6.73%)	⬆️
... and 12 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

[msherif1234]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1200 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[memodi]

/ok-to-test

[github-actions]

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:43ec11c

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=43ec11c make set-plugin-image

[memodi]

/label qe-approved

[msherif1234]

/approve

[jotak]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak, msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jotak]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment