Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add duration tests #460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Jan 25, 2024

Description

Add unit tests on formatting durations

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@jotak jotak added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels Jan 25, 2024
@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Jan 25, 2024

hey @jpinsonneau this was a simple test file I created last week and forgot to commit, while I was checking duration formatting

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6a3207b) 58.55% compared to head (4bb39a8) 58.58%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #460      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.55%   58.58%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         167      167              
  Lines        8310     8310              
  Branches     1061     1061              
==========================================
+ Hits         4866     4868       +2     
+ Misses       3135     3133       -2     
  Partials      309      309              
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 59.19% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests 56.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for adding this @jotak

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Jan 25, 2024

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5d8faa0 into netobserv:main Jan 25, 2024
10 checks passed
@jotak jotak deleted the duration-test branch February 8, 2024 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants