Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1520 Create plugin CI and cypress configs #486

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau commented Feb 27, 2024

Description

  • add cypress Dockerfile
  • add CI Dockerfile

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.44%. Comparing base (fbb17d6) to head (80bc7ec).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #486   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.44%   57.44%           
=======================================
  Files         167      167           
  Lines        8681     8681           
  Branches     1118     1118           
=======================================
  Hits         4987     4987           
  Misses       3374     3374           
  Partials      320      320           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 58.32% <ø> (ø)
unittests 54.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@memodi memodi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jpinsonneau - from code review its LGTM, I think we'd have test this in prow Ci configs.

@memodi
Copy link
Contributor

memodi commented Mar 1, 2024

/approve

@memodi
Copy link
Contributor

memodi commented Mar 1, 2024

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 1, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: memodi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging this to unlock your tests @memodi 😸

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f0fbac4 into netobserv:main Mar 1, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants