Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1630 allow not for ip filters #533

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau commented May 30, 2024

Description

Allow not for ip filters
image

https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/query/ip/

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.65%. Comparing base (d53b334) to head (4466f23).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #533      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.71%   56.65%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines        8990     9000      +10     
  Branches     1179     1179              
==========================================
  Hits         5099     5099              
- Misses       3528     3535       +7     
- Partials      363      366       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 57.85% <ø> (ø)
unittests 53.22% <25.00%> (-0.23%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
pkg/loki/flow_query.go 64.90% <40.00%> (-1.77%) ⬇️
pkg/model/filters/logql.go 68.35% <0.00%> (-1.78%) ⬇️

Comment on lines -123 to -125
if filter.Not {
return fmt.Errorf("'not' operation not allowed in IP filters")
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jotak do you remember any reason why not allowing it ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps.. laziness ? Honestly no I don't remember

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

haha no worries. I was wondering if it was related to a specific case not working but I didn't found any during my tests

Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code lgtm, not tested

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jun 3, 2024
@Amoghrd
Copy link
Contributor

Amoghrd commented Jun 3, 2024

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:791e663

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=791e663 make set-plugin-image

@Amoghrd
Copy link
Contributor

Amoghrd commented Jun 3, 2024

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved QE has approved this pull request label Jun 3, 2024
@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Jun 4, 2024

@jpinsonneau can you open a backport PR? thanks!

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Jun 4, 2024

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 4, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Jun 4, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 33c96ea into netobserv:main Jun 4, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. qe-approved QE has approved this pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants