Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-365 Fix errors in operator logs #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2022

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented May 18, 2022

The errors we see in the operator logs are due to trying to clean items from the previous namespace (in the case of a changing namespace), despite the context here is not a changing namespace.
So I just duplicated the cleanup function to allow cleaning the current namespace.

Copy link
Contributor

@OlivierCazade OlivierCazade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm thanks!

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented May 18, 2022

thanks,
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 18, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b2dc47f into netobserv:main May 18, 2022
@jotak jotak deleted the fix-cleanup-flp branch December 7, 2022 04:02
KalmanMeth pushed a commit to KalmanMeth/network-observability-operator that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2023
Asynchronous pipeline, initial integration
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants