Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix deployment on non-ovnk (e.g. kind) #277

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Feb 21, 2023

Exit silently when ovn-k workloads aren't found, when they are not required

@jotak jotak added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels Feb 21, 2023
@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 21, 2023

This bug was seen while testing the bundle on KIND (for upstream release). As a result I did not release 1.0.2 on non-openshift operatorhub

}, ds); err != nil {
if kerr.IsNotFound(err) && !target.Spec.UseIPFIX() {
// If we don't want IPFIX and ovn-k daemonset is not found, assume there no ovn-k, just succeed silently
return nil
Copy link
Contributor

@msherif1234 msherif1234 Feb 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add a log info message here just stating non ovn-kubernetes mode ? will probably be handy when look in the logs ?

Copy link
Member Author

@jotak jotak Feb 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure - done

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 22, 2023

Thanks @msherif1234
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5eec3ae into netobserv:main Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants