Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor bundling for upstream operatorhub releases #363

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Jun 5, 2023

Bundling on upstream k8S operatorhub was broken for a while (we didn't release 1.0.2 as we did on openshift's operatorhub)

These changes bring back a non-openshift OLM bundle target (it allowed to get this PR merged: k8s-operatorhub/community-operators#2850 )

The tl;dr is: kustomize files have been moved around to permit building two different OLM bundles, the one for openshift as usual (e.g. with make bundle-update as usual) and the one for https://github.com/k8s-operatorhub/community-operators, with BUNDLE_CONFIG=config/k8s-olm make bundle-update

I've also added some automation around the operatorhub release (make prepare-operatorhub) and updated the RELEASE.md doc

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #363 (670e0a7) into main (63c9a93) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #363   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.58%   53.58%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        5488     5488           
=======================================
  Hits         2941     2941           
- Misses       2337     2338    +1     
+ Partials      210      209    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 53.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

OlivierCazade
OlivierCazade previously approved these changes Jun 26, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@OlivierCazade OlivierCazade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jun 28, 2023
@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Jun 28, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0985c36 into netobserv:main Jun 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants