NETOBSERV-974: Add SASL support for KAFKA (unsupported feature)

[jotak]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-974 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #377 (6a1c6f4) into main (0e58e62) will increase coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is 47.19%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #377      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.39%   53.60%   +0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          45       45              
  Lines        5381     5466      +85     
==========================================
+ Hits         2873     2930      +57     
- Misses       2303     2330      +27     
- Partials      205      206       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	53.60% <47.19%> (+0.21%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/v1alpha1/flowcollector_webhook.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v1alpha1/zz_generated.conversion.go	0.26% <ø> (ø)
api/v1beta1/flowcollector_types.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
api/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go	51.62% <0.00%> (-2.52%)	⬇️
controllers/ebpf/agent_controller.go	80.54% <28.57%> (-5.24%)	⬇️
controllers/flowlogspipeline/flp_reconciler.go	69.51% <62.50%> (-4.82%)	⬇️
controllers/flowlogspipeline/flp_common_objects.go	86.60% <80.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
...ontrollers/flowlogspipeline/flp_transfo_objects.go	93.68% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
pkg/helper/flowcollector.go	67.14% <100.00%> (+0.96%)	⬆️
pkg/volumes/builder.go	100.00% <100.00%> (+4.44%)	⬆️
... and 2 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[jotak]

For info, I found a bug in the agent reconciler fixed in the last commit, not specific to this PR - if for some reason we delay merging this PR, I would need to open another one (but given it's marked as "unsupported" I don't think there's reasons to not merge it?)

[jpinsonneau]

code LGTM, thanks @jotak

[jotak]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jotak]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment