Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix field wrongly named monolith/monolithic in sample CR #484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Nov 6, 2023

Description

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@jotak jotak added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels Nov 6, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f7345c8) 54.90% compared to head (58f8eeb) 54.90%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #484   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.90%   54.90%           
=======================================
  Files          49       49           
  Lines        6453     6453           
=======================================
  Hits         3543     3543           
  Misses       2666     2666           
  Partials      244      244           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 54.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Nov 6, 2023

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 6, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Nov 6, 2023
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 03ee25b into netobserv:main Nov 6, 2023
10 checks passed
@jotak jotak deleted the fix-sample-monolithic branch November 7, 2023 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants