Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc feedback #568

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

doc feedback #568

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Feb 13, 2024

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 13, 2024

(For info it's not needed to backport this PR, it can be merged just in main)

Copy link
Contributor

@skrthomas skrthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for making these updates Joel. I'm glad it doesn't need to be backported 😅 lgtm!

@skrthomas
Copy link
Contributor

skrthomas commented Feb 13, 2024

Edit: It seems like no one is sure and some people are saying they don't get PM approval for GitHub links in autogenerated APIs so, I guess to heck with the contributing guidelines warning against it 😆 just keep the GitHub link. Sorry for worrying you. I think I've had too many sweaty discussions with Eric Rich about including GitHub links 😅

Second edit: with Slack consensus from interested parties on the docs team, I'm opening a PR to modify our contributing guidelines to make an exception for github links in autogenerated API docs: openshift/openshift-docs#71592

For the GitHub link: openshift/openshift-docs#71033 (comment), since the style of product docs doesn't really play nicely for the upstream documentation, I can amend the link in the product doc version only. Otherwise, I'm double checking with the docs team about this issue. I feel its a really good example for why we need to be able to put links in modules. It sucks because we literally have this same reference replicated in product docs but we can't create a proper link :(

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 14, 2024

/retest

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 14, 2024

@skrthomas thanks!
I added @nathan-weinberg 's suggestion about "use at your own risk", so I think we're good now

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@jotak: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-operator d916f8c link false /test e2e-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@nathan-weinberg nathan-weinberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Feb 14, 2024

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5e97123 into netobserv:main Feb 14, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants