Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace "handshake RTT" mentions with "smoothed RTT" #643

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented May 15, 2024

Description

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@jotak jotak added the no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval label May 15, 2024
@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.08%. Comparing base (b71829f) to head (fc5b468).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #643      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.00%   67.08%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        7804     7804              
==========================================
+ Hits         5229     5235       +6     
+ Misses       2197     2194       -3     
+ Partials      378      375       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.08% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented May 16, 2024

thanks @msherif1234
/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 76023fe into netobserv:main May 16, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants