Add bboxes sample data

[sfmig]

Description

What is this PR

• Bug fix
• Addition of a new feature
• Other

Why is this PR needed?
We are adding a bounding boxes dataset and we need sample data to test it.

In the GIN repository for the test data, I added a sample VIA tracks file and updated the metadata file. To distinguish between pose and bounding boxes data, I added a type field in the metadata.yaml file.

This PR adapts the code to take that into account.

What does this PR do?
Adapts the sample_data module to load the sample bounding boxes file.

The data is not loaded yet as a dataset, since that is the focus of PR #229. As a result, that bit is not fully tested (yet), and codecov shows fail.

References

\

How has this PR been tested?

Tests pass locally and in CI.

Is this a breaking change?

We should be able to load old versions of the sample data, but I am not sure that is actually a functionality we want to support. Tests wouldn't pass with the old metadata file though (because we check the keys are the expected ones, which now include 'type').

Does this PR require an update to the documentation?

Yes, the CONTRIBUTING.md file has been updated.

Checklist:

• The code has been tested locally
• Tests have been added to cover all new functionality
• The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes
• The code has been formatted with pre-commit

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.70%. Comparing base (2e406e1) to head (aab31c3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #231   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.70%   99.70%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         678      681    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits          676      679    +3     
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lochhh]

Thanks @sfmig! Minor suggestions and changes. I would also remove (3/4) from the PR title before merging.

[lochhh]

I also had a go at refactoring fetch_dataset_paths and went ahead with replacing "pose"-related docstrings in sample_data.py with the more generic "data" as you've done with the var names.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[lochhh]

Good to go 🚀 only held off by Anaconda issues