Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add axlr reward denom #305

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

NeverHappened
Copy link
Contributor

@NeverHappened NeverHappened commented Aug 18, 2023

NOTE: changed base branch to avoid merge conflicts in upgrades handler

https://hadronlabs.atlassian.net/browse/NTRN-87

@NeverHappened NeverHappened self-assigned this Aug 18, 2023
@NeverHappened NeverHappened changed the base branch from main to feat/contract-manager-resubmit August 18, 2023 13:58
Copy link
Collaborator

@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are conflicts in your PR, please resolve them

var denoms []string
keepers.CcvConsumerSubspace.Get(ctx, ccvconsumertypes.KeyRewardDenoms, &denoms)

// add new denom
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please specify what denom is that exactly


suite.Require().True(ccvConsumerSubspace.Has(ctx, ccvconsumertypes.KeyRewardDenoms))

var denomsBefore []string
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There should be "ntrtn" actually, cause we have it on mainnet currently

@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler merged commit c73e5ed into feat/contract-manager-resubmit Aug 28, 2023
@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler deleted the feat/axlr-reward-denoms branch May 9, 2024 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants