Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more info to description of nc-backup.cnf #1073

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ovpc
Copy link
Collaborator

@ovpc ovpc commented Jan 31, 2020

What seems obvious to us, may be unclear for 1st timers ;-)

People ask about this and backups in general.

What seems obvious to us, may be unclear for 1st timers ;-)
@ovpc ovpc requested a review from nachoparker January 31, 2020 17:39
@nachoparker
Copy link
Member

I like it, thanks. I would omit the snapshots part because it can be confusing. You still need to somehow transfer the snapshot to the new drive (maybe btrfs-sync), since that data is not included in the dataless backup and from the description it might seem like it is.

@ovpc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ovpc commented Feb 3, 2020

Agree, could be confusing.
Have edited my patch, so you can push it.

@ovpc ovpc closed this Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc reopened this Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc changed the title Add more info to description Add more info to description to nc-data.cnf Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc self-assigned this Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc added the doc label Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc changed the title Add more info to description to nc-data.cnf Add more info to description to nc-backup.cnf Feb 3, 2020
@ovpc ovpc changed the title Add more info to description to nc-backup.cnf Add more info to description of nc-backup.cnf Feb 3, 2020
@nachoparker nachoparker merged commit 986046f into devel Feb 5, 2020
@nachoparker nachoparker deleted the ovpc-patch-1 branch February 5, 2020 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants