-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consolidate and fix migration #425
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works 👍
Also in theory your migrations are named wrongly. So in theory your files should be called |
OMG. You're right. |
I can change this, but does this affect the migration system, if users installed the RCs? |
Since RC is git only, you can do it. But you can simply change the file+class names and run the update locally and see if it does 💥 |
@nickvergessen thanks for help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you never released this yet, consolidating is okay. But in theory you should not do this as soon as it was released. You should also never edit a released migration, just add a new one.
And you file names should be 0009 not 000009. But not too important.
But the && stuff needs changing
@nickvergessen I am a nitpicker. :-) So thanks for the hint. I updated the file names. |
@nickvergessen This was indeed because this was never released. I just wanted to make it more handy for the initial use of the migration system. |
Removed th second table check.
👍🏼 |
#424