Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[oc] Fix initMountPoints to set usersSetup earlier #2007

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2016

Conversation

rullzer
Copy link
Member

@rullzer rullzer commented Nov 3, 2016

This is needed because in some cases like LDAP, the user manager itself
might trigger avatar updates which would internally also call
initMountPoints with the same user. This could cause the same user to
be setup twice, and in some sharing situations could cause recursive
deduplication of shares by adding "(2)" every time.

See: owncloud/core#26411

@blizzz @icewind1991 please have a look.

This is needed because in some cases like LDAP, the user manager itself
might trigger avatar updates which would internally also call
initMountPoints with the same user. This could cause the same user to
be setup twice, and in some sharing situations could cause recursive
deduplication of shares by adding "(2)" every time.
@rullzer rullzer added 3. to review Waiting for reviews downstream labels Nov 3, 2016
@rullzer rullzer added this to the Nextcloud 11.0 milestone Nov 3, 2016
@mention-bot
Copy link

@rullzer, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @PVince81, @icewind1991 and @nickvergessen to be potential reviewers.

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

Ref #1915

@icewind1991
Copy link
Member

👍 looks good

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

Tested and works 👍

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke merged commit f42d5b6 into master Nov 4, 2016
@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke deleted the downstream-26411 branch November 4, 2016 14:03
@blizzz
Copy link
Member

blizzz commented Nov 29, 2016

useful anyway, but did we really suffer this underlying issue? thought it was fixed within LDAP or so. Well, good to have this either way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants