-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(docs): added missing package manager tabs in cli docs #3606
Conversation
|
@awesome-pro is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextUI Inc Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@awesome-pro has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the NextUI documentation by replacing inline code blocks with a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/docs/content/docs/guide/cli.mdx (2 hunks)
- apps/docs/content/docs/guide/installation.mdx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/docs/content/docs/guide/cli.mdx
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/docs/content/docs/guide/installation.mdx (2)
42-49
: Verify the correctness of installation commands.Ensure the commands for each package manager correctly install dependencies in the
my-nextui-app
directory.Verification successful
Verified: Correct installation commands.
The installation commands for each package manager correctly install dependencies in the
my-nextui-app
directory.
npm
:cd my-nextui-app && npm install
yarn
:cd my-nextui-app && yarn install
pnpm
:cd my-nextui-app && pnpm install
bun
:cd my-nextui-app && bun install
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the installation commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the installation commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands={{\n npm: "cd my-nextui-app && npm install",\n yarn: "cd my-nextui-app && yarn install",\n pnpm: "cd my-nextui-app && pnpm install",\n bun: "cd my-nextui-app && bun install",\n }}\n/>'Length of output: 733
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the installation commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the installation commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands={{\n npm: "cd my-nextui-app \\&\\& npm install",\n yarn: "cd my-nextui-app \\&\\& yarn install",\n pnpm: "cd my-nextui-app \\&\\& pnpm install",\n bun: "cd my-nextui-app \\&\\& bun install",\n }}\n/>'Length of output: 749
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the installation commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the <PackageManagers> component. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 10 '<PackageManagers'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the installation commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the <PackageManagers> component. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg -A 10 '<PackageManagers'Length of output: 75629
52-59
: Verify the correctness of server start commands.Ensure the commands for each package manager correctly start the local server.
Verification successful
Correct the regex pattern and re-run the verification script.
The previous regex pattern contained an error. Let's correct it and verify the server start commands again.
Correct the regex pattern by escaping curly braces and re-run the verification script.
The previous regex pattern contained an error due to unescaped curly braces. Let's correct it and verify the server start commands again.
Enable multiline mode in the regex pattern and re-run the verification script.
The previous regex pattern contained an error due to literal new line characters. Let's enable multiline mode and verify the server start commands again.
Remove file type specification and re-run the verification script.
The previous script failed because
mdx
is not recognized as a valid file type. Let's search all files for the pattern.
The server start commands are correct.
The commands for each package manager correctly start the local server as specified.
- npm:
npm run dev
- yarn:
yarn run dev
- pnpm:
pnpm run dev
- bun:
bun run dev
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the server start commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the server start commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands={{\n npm: "npm run dev",\n yarn: "yarn run dev",\n pnpm: "pnpm run dev",\n bun: "bun run dev",\n }}\n/>'Length of output: 573
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the server start commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the server start commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands={{\n npm: "npm run dev",\n yarn: "yarn run dev",\n pnpm: "pnpm run dev",\n bun: "bun run dev",\n }}\n/>'Length of output: 573
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the server start commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the server start commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands=\\{\\{\n npm: "npm run dev",\n yarn: "yarn run dev",\n pnpm: "pnpm run dev",\n bun: "bun run dev",\n \\}\\}\n/>'Length of output: 357
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the server start commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the server start commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --multiline --type mdx -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands=\\{\\{\n npm: "npm run dev",\n yarn: "yarn run dev",\n pnpm: "pnpm run dev",\n bun: "bun run dev",\n \\}\\}\n/>'Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the server start commands for each package manager. # Test: Search for the server start commands. Expect: Correct commands for each package manager. rg --multiline -A 5 $'<PackageManagers\n commands=\\{\\{\n npm: "npm run dev",\n yarn: "yarn run dev",\n pnpm: "pnpm run dev",\n bun: "bun run dev",\n \\}\\}\n/>'Length of output: 1837
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
L33 needs to be updated as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/docs/content/docs/guide/cli.mdx (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/docs/content/docs/guide/cli.mdx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why reverting all changes?
I was due to a small git branch mistake,
I will resolve soon
…On Sat, Aug 10, 2024, 1:15 PM աӄա ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
why reverting all changes?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3606 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BDIO6HRBBTFA6WGJNMQYSRDZQXAH5AVCNFSM6AAAAABL63XFJ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDEMZRGM3DQOBYGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Closes #3605
📝 Description
⛳️ Current behavior (updates)
🚀 New behavior
💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No): NO
📝 Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
<PackageManagers>
component for improved presentation of package manager commands in the documentation.<PackageManagers>
component, enhancing clarity and consistency.Documentation
<PackageManagers>
component in documentation for better readability and maintainability.