Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

types(core): allow Promise<void> for provider navigate prop #4098

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

CanRau
Copy link
Contributor

@CanRau CanRau commented Nov 16, 2024

📝 Description

At least TanStack Router's router.navigate returns Promise<void> so if this PR won't break anything would be nice to support both return types ❤️

⛳️ Current behavior (updates)

Type '(to: any, options: any) => Promise<void>' is not assignable to type '(path: string) => void'.

The to: any, options: any is another topic I think

🚀 New behavior

No type errors

💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):

Shouldn't break anything I think 🤔

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the navigate function to support asynchronous operations by allowing it to return a promise.

This change improves flexibility in navigation handling within the application.

wingkwong and others added 2 commits October 23, 2024 10:42
@CanRau CanRau requested a review from jrgarciadev as a code owner November 16, 2024 19:28
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 16, 2024

@CanRau is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextUI Inc Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 16, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8ffb7b8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the NextUIProviderProps interface in the provider.tsx file. The navigate property is updated to accept a return type of either void or Promise<void>, allowing for asynchronous navigation handling. No other significant changes to the component's logic or structure are made, maintaining the overall functionality of the NextUIProvider.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/core/system/src/provider.tsx Updated navigate property in NextUIProviderProps interface to allow return type of `void

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/core/system/src/provider.tsx (1)

34-34: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation

The type change to support Promise<void> is well-aligned with modern router implementations and maintains backward compatibility.

Consider updating the documentation to reflect the async capability:

  /**
   * Provides a client side router to all nested components such as
   * Link, Menu, Tabs, Table, etc.
+  * @param path - The path to navigate to
+  * @returns void or Promise<void> for async navigation
   */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c8b70d and 8ffb7b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/core/system/src/provider.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/core/system/src/provider.tsx (2)

34-34: Implementation looks solid and non-breaking

The type enhancement to support Promise<void> is well-implemented:

  1. Maintains backward compatibility with synchronous navigation
  2. Enables support for async routers like TanStack Router
  3. Doesn't affect runtime behavior

Line range hint 63-69: Verify RouterProvider compatibility with Promise

The RouterProvider from @react-aria/utils needs to properly handle async navigation.

✅ Verification successful

RouterProvider from @react-aria/utils is compatible with Promise navigation

The implementation is safe because:

  1. The navigate prop type in the provider explicitly supports Promise<void> return type
  2. RouterProvider from @react-aria/utils is used as a pass-through component that simply provides the navigation context
  3. The documentation shows examples of integration with various routers including TanStack Router which supports async navigation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check RouterProvider implementation for Promise handling
ast-grep --pattern 'RouterProvider = function($_) {
  $$$
  navigate($$$)
  $$$
}'

# Check if there are any existing usages of async navigation
rg -l "navigate.*Promise" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 161


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RouterProvider implementation with broader pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'RouterProvider = $_'

# Search for RouterProvider class or interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface RouterProvider {
  $$$
}'

# Search for navigate type definitions and usages with Promise
rg "navigate.*Promise" -A 3 -B 3

# Search specifically in TypeScript files
rg "navigate.*Promise" --type ts -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 1332


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RouterProvider component implementation
rg "RouterProvider" -A 10 -B 10 --type tsx

# Look for any router-related type definitions
rg "type.*Router|interface.*Router" -A 5 -B 5 --type ts

# Search for navigate prop usage in components
ast-grep --pattern 'navigate={$_}'

Length of output: 165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RouterProvider in all files
rg "RouterProvider" -A 10 -B 10

# Search for navigate prop usage in all files
rg "navigate={" -A 3 -B 3

# Look for router-related imports
rg "import.*Router" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 11173

@jrgarciadev
Copy link
Member

@wingkwong please review

@jrgarciadev jrgarciadev changed the base branch from main to beta/release-next November 17, 2024 14:41
@wingkwong wingkwong added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Nov 17, 2024
@wingkwong wingkwong self-assigned this Nov 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@wingkwong wingkwong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please get rid of those unrelated changes. You may branch out of canary or nextui-org:beta/release-next.

@CanRau
Copy link
Contributor Author

CanRau commented Nov 17, 2024

Oh wow didn't realize, just made this change here in the GitHub editor, I'll have a look a little later

@wingkwong
Copy link
Member

wingkwong commented Nov 18, 2024

@CanRau I think the reason is your patch-2 branch was branched out from our main branch. Currently we haven't synced that to canary.

also please create a changeset.

@CanRau
Copy link
Contributor Author

CanRau commented Nov 18, 2024

Alright, sorry for the delay I'll look into it tomorrow (Monday)

@CanRau
Copy link
Contributor Author

CanRau commented Nov 18, 2024

Redid the PR cause it was quicker 😇
#4112

@CanRau CanRau closed this Nov 18, 2024
@CanRau CanRau deleted the patch-2 branch November 18, 2024 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants