Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ability to parse cobertura files #243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2019

Conversation

ly-cultureiq
Copy link
Contributor

This adds support for files that can be produced by pytest and coverage.py and many other job runners.

if this gets merged ill have a small PR for the github action to use this new setting

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 96.111% when pulling 593d1be on ly-cultureiq:add_cobertura_support into 2ed185c on nickmerwin:master.

@nickmerwin
Copy link
Owner

Thank you @ly-cultureiq!

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Contributor

XhmikosR commented Nov 21, 2019

I'm not sure this should have been merged @nickmerwin ...

cobertura-parse is archived and is also quite big. I mean for Christ's sake, they have mocha in dependencies...

IMO we should revert this and if you really want this to be added, we should fork the repo, bring it to a good shape and publish it on npm.

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
"coverage",
"coveralls"
],
"version": "3.0.7",
"version": "3.0.8",
Copy link
Contributor

@XhmikosR XhmikosR Nov 21, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also please never do this @ly-cultureiq. This is for the maintainers to decide

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

point taken - my apologies

nickmerwin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2019
cobertura-parse is archived and in bad shape. They even have mocha in dependencies.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants