ENH: Add affine_tolerance flag to MergeSeries

[mgxd]

This should help clear up the error found in nipreps/fmriprep#2706

[pep8speaks]

Hello @mgxd, Thank you for updating!

Cheers! There are no style issues detected in this Pull Request. 🍻 To test for issues locally, pip install flake8 and then run flake8 niworkflows.

Comment last updated at 2022-04-08 19:50:29 UTC

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #706 (fd3bf89) into maint/1.4.x (6373632) will increase coverage by 3.23%.
The diff coverage is 80.21%.

❗ Current head fd3bf89 differs from pull request most recent head de1593c. Consider uploading reports for the commit de1593c to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           maint/1.4.x     #706      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        45.94%   49.18%   +3.23%     
===============================================
  Files               46       49       +3     
  Lines             5641     5866     +225     
  Branches           809      837      +28     
===============================================
+ Hits              2592     2885     +293     
+ Misses            2962     2872      -90     
- Partials            87      109      +22     

Flag	Coverage Δ
reportlettests	∅ <ø> (∅)
unittests	49.18% <80.21%> (+3.23%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
niworkflows/interfaces/bids.py	96.21% <ø> (ø)
niworkflows/interfaces/norm.py	25.86% <ø> (ø)
niworkflows/viz/plots.py	22.12% <67.88%> (+16.18%)	⬆️
niworkflows/interfaces/plotting.py	71.83% <73.68%> (-1.51%)	⬇️
niworkflows/interfaces/nibabel.py	70.96% <80.55%> (+4.30%)	⬆️
niworkflows/utils/timeseries.py	83.33% <83.33%> (ø)
niworkflows/utils/testing.py	86.88% <86.88%> (ø)
niworkflows/interfaces/morphology.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
niworkflows/utils/bids.py	75.24% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6373632...de1593c. Read the comment docs.

[effigies]

Looks fine. I'd make the default threshold explicit.

[effigies]

@mgxd sorry to do this, but we're going to need this in maint/1.4.x to get it into fmriprep 21.0.x. Or do we just want to tell these users to upgrade to 22.0?

[mgxd]

Sounds good - I changed the PR to target 1.4.x

[effigies]

Thanks. It did pass, so I'm going to go ahead and merge.