-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Ensure builds are triggered weekly #270
Conversation
Is this to keep the cache from expiring? If not, maybe we should drop cache so we're not surprised by mismatches between |
is there an easy way to specify a stale cache on GHA? I agree dropping the cache can be helpful (just came up in #269) but might be excessive doing it every build |
Codecov ReportBase: 83.94% // Head: 90.74% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #270 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.94% 90.74% +6.80%
==========================================
Files 24 24
Lines 1999 1999
Branches 232 304 +72
==========================================
+ Hits 1678 1814 +136
+ Misses 280 145 -135
+ Partials 41 40 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
My guess would be adding something that changes periodically to the cache name, like |
0796059
to
b49f5e7
Compare
Well, we can worry about better cache names later. Sorry for dropping the ball on this one, which is clearly a good idea on its own. |
No description provided.