add dagger repository

[sagikazarmark]

The following points apply when adding a new repository to repos.json

• I ran ./bin/nur format-manifest after updating repos.json (We will use the same script in github actions to make sure we keep the format consistent)
• By including this repository in NUR I give permission to license the
  content under the MIT license.

Clarification where license should apply:
The license above does not apply to the packages built by the Nix Packages
collection, merely to the package descriptions (i.e., Nix expressions, build
scripts, etc.). It also might not apply to patches included in Nixpkgs, which
may be derivative works of the packages to which they apply. The aforementioned
artifacts are all covered by the licenses of the respective packages.

---

For reference: NixOS/nixpkgs#260848

[Mic92]

I guess the apache license is also fine (afaik compatible to MIT). I sticked to MIT because this is what most of the nix code is licensed as including nixpkgs. This way we don't have to worry about license incompatibility.

[sagikazarmark]

@Mic92 thanks for the quick reply. I'm talking to the Dagger folks to figure out if they want to keep Apache 2.0 which is why I kept it a draft for now.

Tagging @gerhard

Either works for me. If Apache 2.0 is fine, I'll mark it as ready and we are done.

[sagikazarmark]

The decision has been made to revert license to MIT. This PR is good to go.

Thank you all!

[Mic92]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

✅ The pull request has been merged automatically

The pull request has been merged automatically at 771f9aa