-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
terraform/hydra-projects: add unfree #1406
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
flake_uri = "https://github.com/numtide/nixpkgs-unfree/nixpkgs-unstable" | ||
|
||
check_interval = 1800 | ||
scheduling_shares = 5000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is 1000 less than cuda/rocm have.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
ea803f7
to
ad392f7
Compare
https://hydra.nix-community.org/eval/28213#tabs-removed
NixOS/nixpkgs#335271 I think the relevant parts of numtide/nixpkgs-unfree can upstreamed to nixpkgs but what I want to do is keep the current filters as the default version that we can keep building frequently and a "full" version behind an option that can be used for the code coverage job but on a slower channel, built less frequently and at a lower priority than the other hydra jobsets. e.g. default = isUnfree && isSource && isNotCudaPackage && isNotLinuxKernel && canSubstituteSrc;
full = isUnfree && isSource && canSubstituteSrc; resource "hydra_jobset" "nixpkgs_unfree_full" {
nix_expression {
file = "pkgs/top-level/release-unfree.nix"
input = "nixpkgs"
}
input {
name = "full"
type = "boolean"
value = "true"
}
input {
name = "nixpkgs"
type = "git"
value = "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git nixos-unstable"
}
check_interval = ? # once a week
scheduling_shares = 1000
} |
@zimbatm have you seen my previous comment here? |
@zimbatm are you going to upstream this? |
will do 👍 |
No description provided.