Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1093 #1121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2019
Merged

Fix #1093 #1121

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

tathanhdinh
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,
This PR fixes the problem discovered in #1093.
Thanks for any comment.

@tathanhdinh tathanhdinh force-pushed the replace_cstring branch 2 times, most recently from 27ad2c0 to 21ed20a Compare September 6, 2019 01:08
Copy link
Member

@asomers asomers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, but could you please add a CHANGELOG entry?

@tathanhdinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the feedback. CHANGELOG modified.

@asomers
Copy link
Member

asomers commented Sep 16, 2019

Looks good now. As soon as PR #1123 is done, you'll be able to rebase this one and the test failures will be fixed.

@tathanhdinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

tathanhdinh commented Sep 17, 2019

Thank you. I'm waiting for PR #1123 now.

@asomers
Copy link
Member

asomers commented Sep 20, 2019

You should be able to rebase now.

@tathanhdinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you. The PR is rebased.

@otavio
Copy link
Contributor

otavio commented Sep 25, 2019

@tathanhdinh the commit log could receive some love, don't you think?

I know the issue is detailed but it'd be good if the commit log could be extended with it.

Copy link
Member

@asomers asomers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2019
1121: Fix #1093 r=asomers a=tathanhdinh

Hello,
This PR fixes the problem discovered in #1093.
Thanks for any comment.

1130: unistd: getgrouplist: Rework code to use `reserve_double_buffer_size` r=asomers a=otavio

The buffer resize logic can be simplified reusing the
`reserve_double_buffer_size` method.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>

Co-authored-by: Ta Thanh Dinh <tathanhdinh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Sep 28, 2019

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit 9ebc633 into nix-rust:master Sep 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants