-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New WAI adaptation for PAI calculation option from Fang et al. #100
Conversation
@drnimbusrain Are you using the Eq. 12 from Fang et al. 2019? If yes, how about the omega and gamma terms? Also should it be PAI = LAI / (1-alpha)? Otherwise, PAI would be less than LAI. |
Actually, I that is what I am using PAI = LAI/(1-alpha): https://github.com/noaa-oar-arl/canopy-app/pull/100/files#diff-784b83d59c46a5575c78286c41ec9665e53c5edad0c9a4bc4e97e4abdb6cb743R62 |
How about the clumping index (omega term)? The paper says "ΩE is the element clumping index, which quantifies the effect of foliage clumping at scales larger than shoots". Should it be included in the calculation? |
@angehung5 Ah, yes, there are some other details here with gamma_eff (needle-to-shoot ratio, i.e., effect of clumping within the shoot) and omega_eff (clumping index effect beyond the shoot). Omega = Omega_eff/gamma_eff ; Omega)_eff is the clumping beyond the shoot only, where the gamma_eff is the effect of clumping within the shoot. So combining this with Zhang et al. PAI_eff = LAI/(1-alpha) * Omega_eff/gamma_eff, we have a final equation for PAI total (not effective) PAI = LAI/(1-alpha) * Omega. |
@angehung5 OK, updated. |
@drnimbusrain Thanks Patrick! Just reviewed. |
@angehung5 This is the adaption of the WAI contribution using alpha (woody-to-total area ratio) for the PAI calculation option, PAI = LAI (1 - alpha), which is vegetation type dependent now.
This is based on Figure 1 of Fang et al., 2019: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000608