test: listen on ::1 #60
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new functionalities across several files. In Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
test/demo/detect.js (1)
7-9: Enhance error logging for better debuggingThe current error logging could be more descriptive to help identify the specific failure case.
.catch(err => { - console.error(err); + console.error('Port detection failed:', err.message); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
test/demo/detect.js(1 hunks)test/demo/server.js(1 hunks)test/detect-port.test.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/detect-port.test.ts (2)
47-53: LGTM! IPv6 server setup looks good
The server5 setup correctly implements IPv6 support with proper error handling, consistent with other server instances.
112-118: LGTM! IPv6 port detection test is well implemented
The test case follows the established pattern and properly verifies port detection behavior for IPv6.
Let's verify IPv6 test coverage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual IPv6 test implementation and server setup to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Let me check the complete implementation of the port detection logic to understand how IPv6 is handled.
Let me check one final aspect - how the server setup handles different IP versions in the test suite.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
IPv6 test coverage is comprehensive and properly implemented
The test suite demonstrates thorough IPv6 testing with:
- Explicit IPv6 server setup using
::1address - Proper test isolation with server cleanup in
afterhooks - Test coverage for port detection fallback behavior
- Parallel testing with multiple address types (IPv4, IPv6, localhost)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for comprehensive IPv6 testing across the codebase
# Look for other IPv6 related tests
rg -l "::1|localhost|IPv6" --type ts --type js
# Check for potential IPv6 edge cases that might need testing
ast-grep --pattern 'server.listen($_, "::1")'
Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check IPv6 test implementation details
rg -B 5 -A 5 "::1" test/detect-port.test.ts
# Check server setup in main implementation
rg -B 5 -A 5 "::1" src/detect-port.ts
Length of output: 830
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete port detection implementation
rg -B 10 -A 10 "detectPort" src/detect-port.ts
# Check if there are any other IPv6-related configurations or tests
rg -B 5 -A 5 "listen.*port" test/detect-port.test.ts
Length of output: 3309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete test setup including server initialization
rg -B 20 -A 5 "beforeEach|before\(" test/detect-port.test.ts
# Check for server cleanup to ensure proper test isolation
rg -B 5 -A 10 "afterEach|after\(" test/detect-port.test.ts
Length of output: 1399
| server.listen(7001, hostname(), () => { | ||
| console.log('listening %s:7001, address: %o', hostname(), server.address()); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and IPv6 support
Given the PR's objective to support IPv6 (::1), consider these improvements:
- Add error event handler
- Support IPv6 explicitly
-server.listen(7001, hostname(), () => {
+server.on('error', (err) => {
+ console.error('Server error:', err);
+});
+
+// Support both IPv4 and IPv6
+server.listen(7001, '::', () => {
console.log('listening %s:7001, address: %o', hostname(), server.address());
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server.listen(7001, hostname(), () => { | |
| console.log('listening %s:7001, address: %o', hostname(), server.address()); | |
| }); | |
| server.on('error', (err) => { | |
| console.error('Server error:', err); | |
| }); | |
| // Support both IPv4 and IPv6 | |
| server.listen(7001, '::', () => { | |
| console.log('listening %s:7001, address: %o', hostname(), server.address()); | |
| }); |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes