-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "lookup: temporarily use head for jest" #901
Conversation
This reverts commit 479d799.
It seems that a new commit is always necessary to fix the lockfile after a release: If we remove |
😅 From yarnpkg/berry#3486 (comment) we can probably pass We need the extra commit as we cannot use |
Co-authored-by: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Ah jeez, we've broken the |
28.0.2 is out with the above fix. Can you re-trigger? 🤞 |
Thanks for looking into it. I've rerun (using this branch of
I could also reproduce locally with |
Ah, nice! It's the result of |
I can also reproduce locally with:
Same error and stack. |
Aha - |
Running "build:js" before "remove-examples" works for me. |
Is that not what Line 266 in d3dedd0
Is the issue that install is run before |
Here's the result of
|
Ah, I thought the installation of the examples failed. If it's just running the tests then we can change the order As for the failing test, sounds like an issue with symlinks |
Co-authored-by: Simen Bekkhus <sbekkhus91@gmail.com>
Looks like it passed? 🥳 |
Land it? 😀 |
Would someone in @nodejs/citgm mind landing this? (I guess I should request to be added to that team.) |
We could also add this repository to the list in nodejs/Release#557 and grant all releasers maintain access? |
Thanks, folks! Happy that Jest is green on CITGM again. We do lots of weird stuff, good to get notice as early as possible about compat issues 😀 |
Reverts #899
It seems Jest failing under CITGM on all platforms with v28.0.1 (peerDeps related?)