-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: add minutes for meeting 16 jan #271
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if there's likely to be any other types of meetings in meetings-other/
that we should distinguish the best practices meetings in the file path/filename, or if this should be under wg-meetings
(e.g. in a subfolder there).
meetings-other/2019-01-16.md
Outdated
|
||
## Announcements | ||
|
||
* No accouncements this week. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* No accouncements this week. | |
* No announcements this week. |
meetings-other/2019-01-16.md
Outdated
* Diagnostics Best Practices Guide content definition meeting [#254](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/254) | ||
|
||
* Baseline issue to discuss “Best practices” - https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/211 | ||
* First question is how we structure the Best parctices guide. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* First question is how we structure the Best parctices guide. | |
* First question is how we structure the Best practices guide? |
meetings-other/2019-01-16.md
Outdated
* Gireesh, one issue is that there may be a lot of deployment variations so hard to | ||
start there. On the other hand production deployments will still need the steps to get | ||
There. | ||
* Michael, starting with symptom provides common basis that can be used to build base content |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Michael, starting with symptom provides common basis that can be used to build base content | |
* Michael, starting with symptom provides common basis that can be used to build base content. |
meetings-other/2019-01-16.md
Outdated
and then having a second layer with additional guidance for specific deployment | ||
environments. | ||
|
||
* Next question is how to prioritize the content |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Next question is how to prioritize the content | |
* Next question is how to prioritize the content? |
meetings-other/2019-01-16.md
Outdated
* Matheus, start with symptom then narrow down to deployment scenarios. (same as Michael) | ||
* Gireesh, one issue is that there may be a lot of deployment variations so hard to | ||
start there. On the other hand production deployments will still need the steps to get | ||
There. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There. | |
there. |
@richardlau - thanks; I am also not sure if there could be other meetings of this class, kept it separately as I think this is different from WG meetings - the proceedings that run up to this meeting, the people that involved etc. However I am open to move the file if there are more (and strong) opinions for it. |
PR-URL: nodejs#271 Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <Michael_Dawson@ca.ibm.com>
df33470
to
3f1c93c
Compare
landed as 3f1c93c |
No description provided.