Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: release 8.2.1 #2493

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: release 8.2.1 #2493

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2021

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*

8.2.1 (2021-10-07)

Tests

Miscellaneous

  • deps: bump make-fetch-happen from 8.0.14 to 9.1.0 (b05b4fe)
  • refactor the creation of config.gypi file (f2ad87f)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

@cclauss cclauss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

To align with nodejs/node#40296

@gengjiawen gengjiawen requested a review from rvagg October 8, 2021 03:43
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Oct 8, 2021

My thinking was that we should get #2497 in before a release, since f2ad87f was prep for that work. It would (presumably) be a semver-minor.

What do folks think? Try and get that in? Or push this out now and deal with that one separately?

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 11, 2021

@gengjiawen
Copy link
Member

Would this release fix:

Looks like no. I will create another PR to bump gyp.

@zcbenz
Copy link
Contributor

zcbenz commented Oct 11, 2021

I prefer making #2497 a semver-major, since it will break building modules for old versions of Electron. Rolling out the change slower can give users more time to update their Electron toolings.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Oct 11, 2021
@lukekarrys lukekarrys deleted the release-v8.2.1 branch March 8, 2024 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants