This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
domains: fix stack clearing after error handled #9364
Closed
misterdjules
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:v0.10
from
misterdjules:clear-domains-stack-after-uncaught-exception
Closed
domains: fix stack clearing after error handled #9364
misterdjules
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:v0.10
from
misterdjules:clear-domains-stack-after-uncaught-exception
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack.
/cc @dohse @joyent/node-coreteam. |
LGTM |
misterdjules
pushed a commit
to misterdjules/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2015
caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: nodejs#9364 PR-URL: nodejs#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
@trevnorris Thanks! @dohse @joyent/node-coreteam No regression found on UNICEs and on Windows, landing soon. |
misterdjules
pushed a commit
to misterdjules/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2015
caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: nodejs#9364 PR-URL: nodejs#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com>
misterdjules
pushed a commit
to misterdjules/node-1
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2015
f2a45ca contained a test for a regression that had been introduced by the original change that 77a10ed ported. While 77a10ed did not contain that regression, the test that f2a45ca contained should still be in the code base to prevent any regression from happening in the future. Original message for the commit that contained the test: domains: fix stack clearing after error handled caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: nodejs#9364 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com>
misterdjules
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2015
f2a45ca contained a test for a regression that had been introduced by the original change that 77a10ed ported. While 77a10ed did not contain that regression, the test that f2a45ca contained should still be in the code base to prevent any regression from happening in the future. Original message for the commit that contained the test: domains: fix stack clearing after error handled caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: #9364 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com> PR: #3356 PR-URL: #3356 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <ben@strongloop.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2015
f2a45ca contained a test for a regression that had been introduced by the original change that 77a10ed ported. While 77a10ed did not contain that regression, the test that f2a45ca contained should still be in the code base to prevent any regression from happening in the future. Original message for the commit that contained the test: domains: fix stack clearing after error handled caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: #9364 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com> PR: #3356 PR-URL: #3356 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <ben@strongloop.com>
jasnell
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2015
f2a45ca contained a test for a regression that had been introduced by the original change that 77a10ed ported. While 77a10ed did not contain that regression, the test that f2a45ca contained should still be in the code base to prevent any regression from happening in the future. Original message for the commit that contained the test: domains: fix stack clearing after error handled caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: #9364 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com> PR: #3356 PR-URL: #3356 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <ben@strongloop.com>
jasnell
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2015
f2a45ca contained a test for a regression that had been introduced by the original change that 77a10ed ported. While 77a10ed did not contain that regression, the test that f2a45ca contained should still be in the code base to prevent any regression from happening in the future. Original message for the commit that contained the test: domains: fix stack clearing after error handled caeb677 introduced a regression where the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled by the top-level domain. This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the active domain in the stack. PR: #9364 PR-URL: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#9364 Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <julien.gilli@joyent.com> PR: #3356 PR-URL: #3356 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <ben@strongloop.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
caeb677 introduced a regression where
the domains stack would not be cleared after an error had been handled
by the top-level domain.
This change clears the domains stack regardless of the position of the
active domain in the stack.