-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Object::PreviewEntries returns incorrect results for Set Iterator #24053
Comments
It looks like the inspector is wrong. The set still has 2 and 3 if you actually iterate over it: cc @BridgeAR |
yeah, i think too. so, set.had(2) is returned 'true'. |
further debugging reveals that the problem lies in |
After all the addition to the set, the set looks like this: |
Thank for pointing that out (^_^)
|
Yeah! Happens with Map iterator too. Any idea how to debug in c++. I'm using lldb and find it difficult to inspect values. Line 91 in 56ce6f1
|
@shobhitchittora Have you seen https://github.com/nodejs/llnode/? It’s pretty neat for debugging Node/V8 code. |
@addaleax Sounds cool! Thanks. Let me have a look at it. |
On further inspection, this happens only when you delete the first value in a set or a map. const s = new Set([1,2,3])
// this creates problem
s.delete(1)
s.keys() // [3]
// while this works fine
s.delete(2)
s.keys() |
More investigation shows that the latest Chrome also has the same behavior. Checking v8 bug list for the same. Reported the same to upstream v8 - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=8433. Edit - v8 api code pointer - https://github.com/v8/v8/blob/master/src/api.cc#L9512 |
@shobhitchittora Okay, sounds like nothing we could fix on the Node side? If you end up fixing this in V8 and want any guidance on how to submit a patch to them (this can be tricky if you’re not familiar with it), just let us know. :) |
I already have a fix. Coming up soon. |
Hey @addaleax The fix has been merged as per this - https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/88f8fe19a863c6392bd296faf86c06eff2a41bc1. How can we now get the dep updated in node? |
Fixed in #24514 |
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: #24514 Refs: #24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: #24514 Refs: #24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: #24514 Refs: #24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: nodejs#24514 Refs: nodejs#24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: nodejs#24514 Refs: nodejs#24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: nodejs#24514 Refs: nodejs#24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 PR-URL: nodejs#24514 Refs: nodejs#24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} [The backport to v10.x resolves merge conflicts due to a different way of accessing the “hole” value in V8, different signatures of the `Handle` constructor and the `Shrink()` method, and neighbouring-line conflicts in the test file.] Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 Fixes: nodejs#27882 PR-URL: nodejs#24514 Refs: nodejs#24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Original commit message: Fix collection iterator preview with deleted entries We used to assume that we know the remaining entries returned by the iterator based on the current index. However, that is not accurate, since entries skipped by the current index could be deleted. In the new approach, we allocate conservatively and shrink the result. R=neis@chromium.org Bug: v8:8433 Change-Id: I38a3004dc3af292daabb454bb76f38d65ef437e8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325966 Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57360} [The backport to v10.x resolves merge conflicts due to a different way of accessing the “hole” value in V8, different signatures of the `Handle` constructor and the `Shrink()` method, and neighbouring-line conflicts in the test file.] Refs: v8/v8@88f8fe1 Fixes: #27882 Backport-PR-URL: #27894 PR-URL: #24514 Refs: #24053 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
return :
2
true
true
false
[Set Iterator] { 3 }
[Set Iterator] { 3 }
I added 1, 2, 3 in 'set' instance. and I deleted '2'.
so, 'set' have '2', '3' element, but 'set' return values only '3'.
set.has(2) show 'true'!
10.10 version had a bug, so i upgraded my node version to 11.0, but can't resolve it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: