Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Foundation Core Technical Committee (CTC) Meeting 2016-03-30 #5957

Closed
rvagg opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

Node.js Foundation Core Technical Committee (CTC) Meeting 2016-03-30 #5957

rvagg opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 9 comments
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Comments

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Mar 30, 2016

Time

UTC Wed 30-Mar-2016 20:00:

  • San Francisco: Wed 30-Mar-2016 13:00
  • New York: Wed 30-Mar-2016 16:00
  • Amsterdam: Wed 30-Mar-2016 22:00
  • Moscow: Wed 30-Mar-2016 23:00
  • Sydney: Thu 31-Mar-2016 07:00
  • Tokyo: Thu 31-Mar-2016 05:00

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from ctc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • governance: increase target size for CTC #5879

Invited

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with ctc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Uberconference; participants should have the link & numbers, contact me if you don't.

Public participation

We will attempt to stream our Uberconference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live. If it works, then it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.

Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the CTC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for it.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Mar 30, 2016

@mikeal, @jasnell and myself will be absent from this meeting. I've asked @Fishrock123 to chair this one and it should be pretty quick judging by the agenda!

Uberconference is having some billing problems I think the account should work for this, if it doesn't, please update status here. It might be easier to just cancel the meeting rather than find a alternative quickly enough. I'm working to make sure the Uberconference line will be fine but no guarantees.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Do we actually need to have a meeting today?

@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

I'm at TC39 so please excuse me for not joining this week.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rod Vagg notifications@github.com wrote:

@mikeal https://github.com/mikeal, @jasnell https://github.com/jasnell
and myself will be absent from this meeting. I've asked @Fishrock123
https://github.com/Fishrock123 to chair this one and it should be
pretty quick judging by the agenda!

Uberconference is having some billing problems I think the account
should work for this, if it doesn't, please update status here. It might be
easier to just cancel the meeting rather than find a alternative quickly
enough. I'm working to make sure the Uberconference line will be fine but
no guarantees.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5957 (comment)

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. ctc-meeting labels Mar 30, 2016
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest we skip until next week.

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Mar 30, 2016

Agree.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Mar 30, 2016

Yes, seems good to me.

@srl295
Copy link
Member

srl295 commented Mar 30, 2016

I will not be able to attend today

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Сковорода Никита Андреевич <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Yes, seems good to me.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5957 (comment)

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

Is it final that we are skipping?

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Mar 30, 2016

Got on the call long enough to have a nice chat with Evan, Michael, and Josh about how the meeting isn't happening. See you all next week.

@jasnell jasnell closed this as completed Apr 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants