doc: formatting issues for child_process docs

[mscdex]

• Version: v5.11.0+
• Platform: n/a
• Subsystem: doc, child_process

There are some formatting issues for exec() and execFile() in the child_process docs. Specifically:

• f85412d erroneously added a backslash in front of an asterisk that was already contained within backticks. This causes the backslash to show up when rendered. The backslash can be safely removed. Fixed by ed11ac6.
• The maxBuffer link is not styled like the other properties listed and looks out of place. My suggestion would be to have <code>-wrapped content within links to continue to have the same gray background color normally, but switch to the green background color on hover like normal links. There may be other instances of this in the docs, I have not checked.

[rodmachen]

I'm starting work on this issue.

cc: @evanlucas

[lance]

@rodmachen Sorry! Seems there was a race condition here.

[rodmachen]

I have fixed the "backslash in backticks" issue and that commit is included in the PR.

The maxBuffer links are a larger question. Do we need to review styling of such links across all docs? Is this styling issue that needs to be broken out and worked on independently?

I'm open to suggestions.

[mscdex]

/cc @nodejs/documentation What does everyone think about the current styling of backtick-enclosed links?

[tanujasawant]

May I work on this if there's more work to be done?
Everything about maxBuffer seems fine except its appearance in the link is different because of <code>

[jasnell]

@mscdex ... still an issue?

[mscdex]

@jasnell This specific instance was fixed in ea5a2f4. But I think the general issue regarding the current styling of backtick-enclosed links may still be valid.

[maclover7]

Going to close out this issue since the maxBuffer specific problem was fixed. Please feel free to open a new issue regarding backtick-enclosed links if still necessary!