-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Deprecate old debug protocol #10320
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ breakpoint) | |
|
||
## Advanced Usage | ||
|
||
### TCP-based protocol | ||
|
||
> Stability: 0 - Deprecated: Use [V8 Inspector Integration][] instead. The debug protocol used by the `--debug` flag was removed from V8. | ||
|
||
An alternative way of enabling and accessing the debugger is to start | ||
Node.js with the `--debug` command-line flag or by signaling an existing | ||
Node.js process with `SIGUSR1`. | ||
|
@@ -179,12 +183,13 @@ process or via URI reference to the listening debugger: | |
* `node debug <URI>` - Connects to the process via the URI such as | ||
localhost:5858 | ||
|
||
## V8 Inspector Integration for Node.js | ||
### V8 Inspector Integration for Node.js | ||
|
||
**NOTE: This is an experimental feature.** | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wonder if we should remove the "experimental feature" note, especially if we're pointing people to it as an alternative to the deprecated debugger. That doesn't have to happen in this PR (although it could if there's consensus that it should happen). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I was thinking about what the "least worst" option would be. It seemed also bad to remove the doc warning while the runtime still writes one ("docs say go ahead but then the runtime punishes the user with scary warnings"). P.S.: The solution could be to remove the warning in this PR, but there's #8978 already touching those parts. |
||
|
||
V8 Inspector integration allows attaching Chrome DevTools to Node.js | ||
instances for debugging and profiling. | ||
It uses the [Chrome Debugging Protocol][]. | ||
|
||
V8 Inspector can be enabled by passing the `--inspect` flag when starting a | ||
Node.js application. It is also possible to supply a custom port with that flag, | ||
|
@@ -201,4 +206,6 @@ To start debugging, open the following URL in Chrome: | |
chrome-devtools://devtools/remote/serve_file/@60cd6e859b9f557d2312f5bf532f6aec5f284980/inspector.html?experiments=true&v8only=true&ws=localhost:9229/node | ||
``` | ||
|
||
[TCP-based protocol]: https://github.com/v8/v8/wiki/Debugging-Protocol | ||
[Chrome Debugging Protocol]: https://chromedevtools.github.io/debugger-protocol-viewer/ | ||
[TCP-based protocol]: #debugger_tcp_based_protocol | ||
[V8 Inspector Integration]: #debugger_v8_inspector_integration_for_node_js |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Can you wrap this at 80 characters? You should be able to use multiple
>
s to continue the blockquote, the documentation generator should be able to handle thatThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had it on multiple lines at first but line breaks inside of
>
were preserved which looked awkward in the rendered version.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jkrems It's fixed in #11074