-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc, lib, test: do not re-require needlessly #14244
Conversation
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ | |||
'use strict'; | |||
|
|||
const errors = require('internal/errors'); | |||
const util = require('util'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that the intention in this file was to do this require only when really needed so I'm not sure if it's a good idea to require it unconditionally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've checked this. If I don't miss something, this module is required only in the bootstrap_node.js
and the function which requires util
is called there unconditionally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, thanks.
test/sequential/test-util-debug.js
Outdated
@@ -22,13 +22,16 @@ | |||
'use strict'; | |||
const common = require('../common'); | |||
const assert = require('assert'); | |||
let spawn; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I honestly find the original easier in this case, no changes required imho.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reverted.
test/common/index.js
Outdated
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ const fs = require('fs'); | |||
const assert = require('assert'); | |||
const os = require('os'); | |||
const child_process = require('child_process'); | |||
const execSync = child_process.execSync; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could this be made like..
const { execSync, spawn } = require('child_process');
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done for all four methods.
Rebased. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/9265/ (green). |
Landed in 4f87522 |
PR-URL: #14244 Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
This doesn’t land cleanly on 8.x; if you can, please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if you don’t think it’s worth it let me know/add the |
8.x backport: #14524 |
v6.x backport please 😄 |
@MylesBorins |
PR-URL: #14244 Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
doc, lib, test
While cached, re-requiring still has some overhead. So I've checked various patterns prone to re-requiring and tried to reduce it.
Lazy loadings are not touched: if there is a chance that a module may not be required at all, potential re-requiring is left as is.
I have a doubt concerning
pummel\test-vm-memleak.js
: if it tests leaking inrequire
among other leaks, let me know to revert; otherwise the pummelling can be reduced a bit this way.