Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: refactor test-domain-abort-on-uncaught #14541

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Jul 30, 2017

  • use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
  • use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
  • move from sequential to parallel

Fixes: #11826

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test domain

* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

Fixes: nodejs#11826
@Trott Trott added domain Issues and PRs related to the domain subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Jul 30, 2017
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jul 30, 2017

Hypothetically, CI will be https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/9405/ but uh...something's up with CI....

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Jul 30, 2017

@Trott we should start started #14544 a list of tests that need real 💘. Maybe as a "good-second-contribution".

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Jul 30, 2017

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 2, 2017

Landed in 548cc72

@Trott Trott closed this Aug 2, 2017
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: nodejs#14541
Fixes: nodejs#11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: #14541
Fixes: #11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: #14541
Fixes: #11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Aug 16, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: #14541
Fixes: #11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: #14541
Fixes: #11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2017
* use common.mustCall() instead of exit handler
* use execSync instead of exec so test is reliable under load
* move from sequential to parallel

PR-URL: #14541
Fixes: #11826
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott deleted the mv-to-par branch January 13, 2022 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
domain Issues and PRs related to the domain subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix flaky sequential/test-domain-abort-on-uncaught and move back to parallel
8 participants