Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: use local isolate instead of args.GetIsolate #14768

Closed

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Aug 11, 2017

While stepping though SetupPromises I noticed that the environments
Isolate is used but not when creating the string "_setupPromises".

Is there a reason for using args.GetIsolate() instead of using the
environments isolate? I see that GetIsolate() is an inline call, but
could there be situations where it returns a different Isolate?
If not perhaps using the local isolate variable would be a litte
clearer.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

While stepping though SetupPromises I noticed that the environments
Isolate is used but not when creating the string "_setupPromises".

Is there a reason for using args.GetIsolate() instead of using the
environments isolate? I see that GetIsolate() is an inline call, but
could there be situations where it returns a different Isolate?
If not perhaps using the local isolate variable would be a litte
clearer.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Aug 11, 2017
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

This doesn’t need to wait 48 hours, landed in c27360e

@addaleax addaleax closed this Aug 11, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2017
While stepping though SetupPromises I noticed that the environments
Isolate is used but not when creating the string "_setupPromises".

Is there a reason for using args.GetIsolate() instead of using the
environments isolate? I see that GetIsolate() is an inline call, but
could there be situations where it returns a different Isolate?
If not perhaps using the local isolate variable would be a litte
clearer.

PR-URL: #14768
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2017
While stepping though SetupPromises I noticed that the environments
Isolate is used but not when creating the string "_setupPromises".

Is there a reason for using args.GetIsolate() instead of using the
environments isolate? I see that GetIsolate() is an inline call, but
could there be situations where it returns a different Isolate?
If not perhaps using the local isolate variable would be a litte
clearer.

PR-URL: #14768
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@addaleax addaleax mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2017
@danbev danbev deleted the use-isolate-instead-of-GetIsolate branch August 16, 2017 07:39
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2017
While stepping though SetupPromises I noticed that the environments
Isolate is used but not when creating the string "_setupPromises".

Is there a reason for using args.GetIsolate() instead of using the
environments isolate? I see that GetIsolate() is an inline call, but
could there be situations where it returns a different Isolate?
If not perhaps using the local isolate variable would be a litte
clearer.

PR-URL: #14768
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <eaglexrlnk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

backported to 6.x. LMK if it should be backed out

@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Sep 25, 2017

backported to 6.x. LMK if it should be backed out

@MylesBorins Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants