-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
async_hooks: consistent internal naming #15569
async_hooks: consistent internal naming #15569
Conversation
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10219/ /cc @nodejs/async_hooks |
Because of the potential for merge conflicts, I will merge this as soon as 72 hours have passed. If anyone have objections, now is the time to say so. |
Partial re-run of CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-plinux/11672/ |
@jasnell Thanks, but it failed again. I think the CI is having some tough days. New partial CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-plinux/11686/ |
Landed in 3a69ef5 |
PR-URL: #15569 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #15569 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #15569 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Original-PR-URL: nodejs/node#15569 Original-Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Original-Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Original-Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Original-Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: ayojs#87 Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Original-PR-URL: nodejs/node#15569 Original-Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Original-Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Original-Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Original-Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #15569 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Opted for dont-land. LMK if you want to do a larger effort at backporting the current async_hooks implementation to v6.x |
I'm always forgetting those don't land labels :) |
Our internal naming and API doesn't match the external API. This fixes that.
Note: we actually have a bit of external API with the old naming scheme,
promiseHandle.parentId
,newUid
andinitTriggerId
. I didn't touch those, as I wanted to just focus on the internal naming.refack: moved description to top
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
async_hooks