-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Add notes how addMembership should be managed #16240
Conversation
doc/api/dgram.md
Outdated
@@ -95,6 +95,17 @@ Tells the kernel to join a multicast group at the given `multicastAddress` and | |||
one interface and will add membership to it. To add membership to every | |||
available interface, call `addMembership` multiple times, once per interface. | |||
|
|||
When the socket is created, each worker gets a copy and they refer the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does "worker" refer to a cluster environment? If so I think it makes sense to specify it as the sentence seems to be a bit out of context without it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it does and I agreed on it. I will add the context.
doc/api/dgram.md
Outdated
@@ -95,6 +95,17 @@ Tells the kernel to join a multicast group at the given `multicastAddress` and | |||
one interface and will add membership to it. To add membership to every | |||
available interface, call `addMembership` multiple times, once per interface. | |||
|
|||
When the socket is created, each worker gets a copy and they refer the | |||
same socket so you need to manage to call `.addMembership` only once. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please avoid using the informal pronoun you
in the docs :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure! I will update it.
1c7f640
to
5292a50
Compare
@watilde Why did you close this pr? |
ping @watilde - what happened here? the changes look reasonable. was it through an error you deleted the branch and closed the PR? are you planning to resurrect this? |
Fixes: #12572
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc, dgram