-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
buffer: move setupBufferJS to internal #16391
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,13 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
// This is needed still for FastBuffer | ||
module.exports = {}; | ||
const binding = process.binding('buffer'); | ||
const { setupBufferJS } = binding; | ||
|
||
// Remove from the binding so that function is only available as exported here. | ||
// (That is, for internal use only.) | ||
delete binding.setupBufferJS; | ||
|
||
// FastBuffer wil be inserted here by lib/buffer.js | ||
module.exports = { | ||
setupBufferJS | ||
}; |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not blocking, and up for debate:
Since this changes global state, maybe move this to
node_bootstap
, or explicitly require with a comment. Otherwise AFAICT it will run as a side effect ofnode/lib/internal/bootstrap_node.js
Line 295 in 02a5267
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I'd like to keep the caching and removing of
setupBufferJS
in the same place. Would a comment inbootstrap_node.js
clarifying that requiringbuffer
also removes thesetupBufferJS
from the binding be sufficient to clarify? Something like:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another viable option is to add this to
bootstrap_node.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, I'll throw a comment and explicit require in. Stay tuned.