-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: add missing backticks in n-api.md #20390
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codify types, variable names, and code fragments checking patterns I've managed to think of. Some nits were also fixed in passing (add missing periods, remove extra line breaks etc).
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
dont-land-on-v4.x
node-api
Issues and PRs related to the Node-API.
labels
Apr 28, 2018
(Not sure if this can be fast-tracked with more than 200 lines diff, but as the changes are nits-only, |
tniessen
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2018
vsemozhetbyt
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Apr 29, 2018
trivikr
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2018
gabrielschulhof
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2018
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2018
Landed in 8809f8b |
vsemozhetbyt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2018
Codify types, variable names, and code fragments checking patterns I've managed to think of. Some nits were also fixed in passing (add missing periods, remove extra line breaks etc). PR-URL: #20390 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2018
Codify types, variable names, and code fragments checking patterns I've managed to think of. Some nits were also fixed in passing (add missing periods, remove extra line breaks etc). PR-URL: #20390 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
fast-track
PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.
node-api
Issues and PRs related to the Node-API.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesCodify types, variable names, and code fragments checking patterns I've managed to think of.
Some nits were also fixed in passing (add missing periods, remove extra line breaks etc).
@nodejs/documentation, @nodejs/n-api, sorry for the big diff (it is easily reviewable though): it seems we are a bit (understandably) careless in this big and complicated doc.